Up to this point, the PB Equation has been
justified by somewhat heuristic arguments, and
the thermodynamic connections noted above have
been asserted without proof. In fact the PB
Eq. can be derived as a mean field approximation
to the full statistical mechanics of the classical
Coulomb gas problem in such a way that the attendant
thermodynamic connection emerges naturally.
One way to do this [47] is via a Lattice Field Theory
formulation of the full problem [38]. Using the
identity
(essentially, ``the Coulomb potential is the Green's
function of the Laplacian operator"),
it is possible to derive the following
exact expression for the Grand Partition Function
for the Coulomb gas Hamiltonian (an arbitrary
collection of mobile ions surrounding an arbitrary
assembly of fixed charges) [38]:
| (43) |
Here
is an auxiliary scalar field, discretized onto
a cubic lattice (with value
at lattice site
), and S is precisely the functional defined above
in Eq. 38, evaluated at
[48].
According to
Eq. 43, it is necessary to integrate over all field
configurations obtained by
letting each
independently take on all real values.
This
is a daunting exercise in multidimensional
integration, particularly since the limit of
arbitrarily fine lattice mesh, hence arbitrarily large
number of
variables, must be taken. Monte-Carlo
sampling provides a possible way of carrying out
the required integrations. An alternate route, which
has proven useful in a variety of applications, is
a saddle point or steepest descent expansion procedure.
In this approach we find the
field configuration
which extremizes the argument of the exponent, then
perform a Taylor's series expansion about this configuration,
as described below. The extremization conditions are
obtained by setting
.It turns out that the extremizing
field is
completely imaginary, so it is useful to write
,where
is the
value of the (real) extremizing field, and
is
a real-valued field that characterizes fluctuations
about the extremizing field. Expressed in terms of
the
field the extremizing conditions are
. These generate the
Lattice PB Equations noted above. Once this field configuration
(denoted
)has been obtained, we then expand about it to write:
| (44) |
where "
" are the quadratic and higher order terms
in the expansion of
about the reference
configuration
.To this point no approximation has been made. However,
this form suggests a systematic approximation
procedure. Assuming first that the fluctuations
are small [49],
we neglect the fluctuation integrals
and approximate:
| (45) |
hence in this approximation
. This establishes the thermodynamic connection
of the PB field asserted above.
Now, to see how important the neglected terms (fluctuation integrals) are, we can attempt to perform them. If cubic and higher fluctuations are neglected the integrals are Gaussian and can be reduced to the calculation of a single determinant (this is referred to as the one loop correction). Finally, to include cubic and higher order effects, we expand down the anharmonic terms and perform ``Gaussian moment" integrals (two loop corrections and higher).
To give an illustration of the LFT method, we show in Figure 4 computations of the pair-correlation function of a fluid of charged polyballs (spherical colloids). This figure is taken from Ref. [50], where a full specification of relevant parameters is given. Calculations were done via standard Metropolis sampling, with LFT used at each trial configuration of the many-polyball system to calculate the effective inter-polyball potential ab initio. By ab initio we mean that the potential of mean force for the many-polyball system was computed from statistical mechanics using LFT. No assumption of pairwise decomposition of the potential of mean force was made. The centers of the polyballs were restricted to lattice positions, and Metropolis moves were carried out ``on lattice". Most LFT evaluations were done at the mean field (PB) level, but occasionally 1-loop corrections were computed. These were found to be orders of magnitude smaller than the mean field contributions, and hence negligible for the system under study. In Fig. 4 the LFT results for the pair-correlation function are compared with pairwise additive approximations. The deviation in quantitative details of LFT and pair-potential results suggests the desirability of going beyond pair-wise additive theories in the study of dense, highly charged macroion/electrolyte systems.