A strength of the LFT formalism is that it provides a
rigorous starting point for treating problems involving
interacting charge distributions and a route (via
saddlepoint analysis) to systematic and practical
approximation schemes. To illustrate the flexibility
of the method, we consider a system in which in addition
to mobile ions in the Coulomb gas, there are mobile
(point) dipoles as well [51]. In the situation of
direct interest here, these dipoles could represent
polar solvent molecules in which the mobile ions
``swim" and which surround a collection of macroions.
The mobile dipoles affect electrostatic interactions
via the polarization density
, where
is the location of dipole j characterized
by dipole moment
. This polarization density
corresponds to an effective charge density
[5]. The overall electrostatic contribution
of the mobile dipoles can be included simply by adding
the dipole charge density to the contributions associated
with charge monopoles (mobile ions and the charges embedded
on the macroions). The LFT formalism can then be carried
through analogous to the case without the mobile
dipoles [52]. This results in the following expression for
the grand canonical partition function of the Coulomb
gas:
All effects of the mobile dipoles are contained in
the penultimate term in the exponent, where
is the magnitude of the microscopic dipole (in
units of ea, e being the magnitude of the electron
charge and a the lattice spacing),
is
the dimensionless bulk dipole density (i.e.,
, where
is the dimensionful bulk
dipole density and a the lattice spacing),
and
is
the dimensionless excluded volume potential experienced by the
dipoles at lattice point
. Carrying
through the saddle point analysis in the manner discussed in
the previous section, we obtain a Poisson-Boltzmann
type set of lattice field equations:
with
which corresponds to extremization of the following ``action" functional:
As in the dipole-free system,
the extremum defined by Eq. 50 is a strict and
unique minimum of S. Hence the extremizing
field can be identified using a simple annealing
algorithm, in spite of the fact that the equations
are strongly nonlinear in general.
Expanding the partition function integrals about the
saddle point leads to an expression with exactly the
same structure as Eq. (44). Thus S in Eq. (50), evaluated
at the extremizing
configuration,
can be identified as the mean field approximation
to
, where
is the thermodynamic grand potential.
Corrections to the mean field approximation can be
computed via loop expansion, analogous to the case
where there are no mobile dipoles.
Finally it is interesting to note from the structure
of Eq. 47, that
plays
the role of an electric-field dependent polarizability.
At low field strengths it tends to a field-independent
constant which corresponds to the orientational
polarization predicted by the well-known Langevin dipole model [45].
At higher field strengths
becomes
field-strength dependent. It reflects the nonlinear
dependence of the induced dipole moment on the electric
field strength at high field strengths.